login   |    register
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Review
Panda: M8 AGS
CMOT
Staff MemberEditor-in-Chief
ARMORAMA
Visit this Community
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 14, 2006
KitMaker: 10,881 posts
Armorama: 8,536 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 - 01:00 AM UTC


Pete Becerra reviews and builds the M8 Armored Gun System from Panda Hobby in 1/35th scale.

Read the Review

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
Vodnik
Visit this Community
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,312 posts
Armorama: 3,908 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 - 01:08 AM UTC
Only as a static vehicle? Not necessarily

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcBIvW5HQnE


Good review, thanks Pete!
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,800 posts
Armorama: 2,441 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 - 01:30 AM UTC
With all the Wehrmacht '46 and such there's a host of tempting what-if schemes for the M8. 2ACR, 82ABN, foreign service.

Great, comprehensive review.
HeavyArty
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,334 posts
Armorama: 13,479 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 - 01:42 AM UTC
Looks good Pete. It will be interesting to see if/when this is accepted how different it will be. Hopefully Panda will update it in that event.
Epi
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,570 posts
Armorama: 2,542 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 - 05:18 AM UTC
Now this is how a review is supposed to be. The person writes the review to best of his knowledge and ability. After submitting it, others modelers fill in the missing pieces, if any.

In this case, I should have worded my comment about "static display" a bit differently.

Thanks Pawel for catching that. I don't know why I was only thinking static display. I guess we are all so use to building these models in their natural combat habitat that we don't think about training or trial run environments.

Stephen, great suggestion. Last night I saw a Stryker with the Dragon Wittman taking a picture set and two armored suits in the snow.

Yes Gino, some add on armor like you see in the video that Pawel posted would be nice.
LonCray1
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: November 28, 2018
KitMaker: 55 posts
Armorama: 42 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 - 06:44 AM UTC
It's a nice looking model and a good review, but I can't be the only one a bit peeved that we get this but still no M88A2 Hercules in 1/35 styrene.
billwinkes
Visit this Community
Alabama, United States
Joined: March 20, 2009
KitMaker: 31 posts
Armorama: 26 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 - 08:17 AM UTC
Thanks so much for the review and the build. I have one on order. I’m looking forward to building it.
Taeuss
Visit this Community
Manitoba, Canada
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,263 posts
Armorama: 3,252 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 31, 2019 - 11:39 AM UTC
An interesting if unexpected addition. Nice build. Good review too!
Trisaw
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,022 posts
Armorama: 2,421 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 31, 2019 - 12:21 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Looks good Pete. It will be interesting to see if/when this is accepted how different it will be. Hopefully Panda will update it in that event.



True. The web shows that the M8 AGS contender for 2018 looks different than the Panda model. For one, the LED headlights makes it look pretty attractive.

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/25559/the-armys-search-for-its-first-light-tank-in-decades-is-down-to-these-two-designs
KurtLaughlin
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,290 posts
Armorama: 2,265 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 23, 2019 - 02:52 PM UTC
I don't understand why the review considers the lack of markings or painting schemes to be a "low" in evaluating the kit:

"Lows: Very weak pins on individual track links. Not very much to do with finished vehicle due to not being in service with the U.S."

How is that Panda's fault? Why should that count against the kit's rating in the review?



KL
knewton
Visit this Community
New Zealand
Joined: June 19, 2013
KitMaker: 1,091 posts
Armorama: 979 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 23, 2019 - 06:01 PM UTC

Quoted Text

I don't understand why the review considers the lack of markings or painting schemes to be a "low" [b]in evaluating the kit.

How is that Panda's fault? Why should that count against the kit's rating in the review?



KL



And you know any decals would have been incorrect anyway, given it is not in service. Nor is likely to be, either. Not really the fault of the manufacturer. Rather accurate really.
RobinNilsson
Staff MemberTOS Moderator
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 5,915 posts
Armorama: 4,957 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 23, 2019 - 10:09 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I don't understand why the review considers the lack of markings or painting schemes to be a "low" [b]in evaluating the kit.

How is that Panda's fault? Why should that count against the kit's rating in the review?



KL



And you know any decals would have been incorrect anyway, given it is not in service. Nor is likely to be, either. Not really the fault of the manufacturer. Rather accurate really.



Sounds like the perfect time saving kit
The whole gloss coat - decals - gloss coat - weathering - flat coat circus can be skipped. Just basic paint + flat coat and off into the display cabinet
Got to get me one of those ....
/ Robin
knewton
Visit this Community
New Zealand
Joined: June 19, 2013
KitMaker: 1,091 posts
Armorama: 979 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 - 09:41 AM UTC
Stand by kids, the M8 is being re-launched with a full suite of APS as seen at #AUSAglobal. And it looks quite the part. Now, I wonder whether Panda will do the “late” version, too. Still no mention of markings, though.
Trisaw
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,022 posts
Armorama: 2,421 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 - 12:20 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Stand by kids, the M8 is being re-launched with a full suite of APS as seen at #AUSAglobal. And it looks quite the part. Now, I wonder whether Panda will do the “late” version, too. Still no mention of markings, though.



Do you have a link or new photo?
knewton
Visit this Community
New Zealand
Joined: June 19, 2013
KitMaker: 1,091 posts
Armorama: 979 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 - 06:40 PM UTC
Link as requested
http://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/topic/833-m8-buford-is-back/page/3/