_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Looks like Amusing Hobby is all in for WoT
ninjrk
Visit this Community
Alabama, United States
Joined: January 26, 2006
KitMaker: 1,381 posts
Armorama: 1,347 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 - 08:14 PM UTC
Which is cool, I am excited for the mythical Type 2605 to go with my Takom Maus. Seriously!



urumomo
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: August 22, 2013
KitMaker: 675 posts
Armorama: 667 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 - 09:46 PM UTC
Interesting post -- could you expand on this please ,
I am unfamiliar with either vehicle pictured .

The 2605 is the Japanese tank ?
What is the vehicle below it ?
Scratch-built , both ?
TheSpearman
Visit this Community
Dublin, Ireland
Joined: August 09, 2010
KitMaker: 33 posts
Armorama: 28 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 - 10:03 PM UTC
The bottom one is a Wargaming creation called the Conqueror Gun Carriage. While there was a trend of proposed SPG vehicles, such as FV207 and FV3805, there was never any blueprints for the ConqGC.

This isn't the first time Amusing Hobby have done this.

The top one is the Type 2605, referred as the Type 5 in WoT.
GTDeath13
Visit this Community
Attica, Greece / Ελλάδα
Joined: June 12, 2015
KitMaker: 921 posts
Armorama: 919 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 - 11:22 PM UTC
I would buy the Conqueror Gun Carrier just for the shake of building all three Amusing Hobby kits of the Conqueror.

And since it is a what-if, would definately change the gun with something longer and BIGGER!!!
ALBOWIE
Visit this Community
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 27, 2017 - 05:14 AM UTC
I'd be happier if they just released a Mk 2 Conqueror
Al
Vicious
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: September 04, 2015
KitMaker: 1,517 posts
Armorama: 1,109 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 27, 2017 - 05:40 AM UTC
Nice the Type 5, if I remember well the Allied found a prototype at the end of the war...
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 27, 2017 - 08:26 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Nice the Type 5, if I remember well the Allied found a prototype at the end of the war...


The prototype found was called the Chi-ri. What's pictured is WOT's take on it.
Roshindow
Visit this Community
Trento, Italy
Joined: May 10, 2014
KitMaker: 34 posts
Armorama: 32 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 27, 2017 - 11:16 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Nice the Type 5, if I remember well the Allied found a prototype at the end of the war...


The prototype found was called the Chi-ri. What's pictured is WOT's take on it.



The Type 2604/5 is not WoT take on the Chi-ri, but possibly a partially built super heavy tank, which turret was used as a costal defence, as seen in this photo. Only the turret was built, but a soviet drawing of the ventilation system suggests the hull shape, as seen here
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 27, 2017 - 11:56 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Nice the Type 5, if I remember well the Allied found a prototype at the end of the war...


The prototype found was called the Chi-ri. What's pictured is WOT's take on it.



The Type 2604/5 is not WoT take on the Chi-ri, but possibly a partially built super heavy tank, which turret was used as a costal defence, as seen in this photo. Only the turret was built, but a soviet drawing of the ventilation system suggests the hull shape, as seen here


So there is the Chi-ri and that napkin scribble supposition proposal of a paper Panzer. One is real and the other is a best guess of a supposition of a theory of a guess of something someone took a photo of. The cryptozoology of tank design.

But it would look awesome in Girls und Panzer markings.
Roshindow
Visit this Community
Trento, Italy
Joined: May 10, 2014
KitMaker: 34 posts
Armorama: 32 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 27, 2017 - 12:02 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Nice the Type 5, if I remember well the Allied found a prototype at the end of the war...


The prototype found was called the Chi-ri. What's pictured is WOT's take on it.



The Type 2604/5 is not WoT take on the Chi-ri, but possibly a partially built super heavy tank, which turret was used as a costal defence, as seen in this photo. Only the turret was built, but a soviet drawing of the ventilation system suggests the hull shape, as seen here


So there is the Chi-ri and that napkin scribble supposition proposal of a paper Panzer. One is real and the other is a best guess of a supposition of a theory of a guess of something someone took a photo of. The cryptozoology of tank design.



Well except for the name they gave it in WoT, Type 5, there is no connection between the two tanks as far as I know
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 27, 2017 - 01:28 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Nice the Type 5, if I remember well the Allied found a prototype at the end of the war...


The prototype found was called the Chi-ri. What's pictured is WOT's take on it.



The Type 2604/5 is not WoT take on the Chi-ri, but possibly a partially built super heavy tank, which turret was used as a costal defence, as seen in this photo. Only the turret was built, but a soviet drawing of the ventilation system suggests the hull shape, as seen here


So there is the Chi-ri and that napkin scribble supposition proposal of a paper Panzer. One is real and the other is a best guess of a supposition of a theory of a guess of something someone took a photo of. The cryptozoology of tank design.



Well except for the name they gave it in WoT, Type 5, there is no connection between the two tanks as far as I know


To me except for size and suspension they appear virtually identical. One looks to be an inflated version of the other with side skirts added.
ninjrk
Visit this Community
Alabama, United States
Joined: January 26, 2006
KitMaker: 1,381 posts
Armorama: 1,347 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 27, 2017 - 04:47 PM UTC
Supposedly, the Type 2604 and 2605 are based on poorly sketched drawings and some engine compartment notes from a Soviet engineer who interviewed Japanese tank designers. It makes the paper panzers look like in-service vehicles by comparison. With that stated, the Type 5 will probably be a fun build and look nice next to a Maus. I confess to being surprised to see a Conqueror variant but also surprised they didn't go for the A45 tank, which was at least built as a prototype and is also in WoT. Maybe down the line though. . . .
JSSVIII
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Friday, July 28, 2017 - 04:26 AM UTC
I would love to see the A45 also Matt, they will release one as soon as Ian finishes his over on ML!
ninjrk
Visit this Community
Alabama, United States
Joined: January 26, 2006
KitMaker: 1,381 posts
Armorama: 1,347 posts
Posted: Friday, July 28, 2017 - 05:44 PM UTC

Quoted Text

I would love to see the A45 also Matt, they will release one as soon as Ian finishes his over on ML!



If it helps, I recently bought a Mk.2 resin Centurion turret and the older Classic Military Vehicles magazine with the photo article as reference to start my own, so I have tried to contribute to this inevitability!
JSSVIII
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 29, 2017 - 02:57 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I would love to see the A45 also Matt, they will release one as soon as Ian finishes his over on ML!



If it helps, I recently bought a Mk.2 resin Centurion turret and the older Classic Military Vehicles magazine with the photo article as reference to start my own, so I have tried to contribute to this inevitability!



Matt, who makes the MK 2 turret, and where can I get one? I need one for my Caernarvon conversion.
ninjrk
Visit this Community
Alabama, United States
Joined: January 26, 2006
KitMaker: 1,381 posts
Armorama: 1,347 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 29, 2017 - 05:44 AM UTC
Lion Marc makes one that is out of production but pops up on ebay (how I got mine). However, Accurate Armor has a new Centurion Mk.2 and Mk.3 conversion set with the turrets available.
SgtRam
Staff MemberContributing Writer
AEROSCALE
#197
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
Armorama: 2,859 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 29, 2017 - 05:45 AM UTC
I have no issue with companies making prototype or "mythical" tanks and planes. As long as it is getting someone into the hobby, I am all game. And from talking to a LHS owner, he says there are kids coming in asking about certain tanks they have seen in the WoT game, so more power to drawing the youth to model building.

JSSVIII
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 29, 2017 - 06:15 AM UTC
I have no issue with it either, in fact I love the prototypes. I just wish some company besides Dragon would do the subjects that are in their Black Label line.
JSSVIII
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 29, 2017 - 06:16 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Lion Marc makes one that is out of production but pops up on ebay (how I got mine). However, Accurate Armor has a new Centurion Mk.2 and Mk.3 conversion set with the turrets available.



Thanks Matt!
 _GOTOTOP