_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Axis - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Axis forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Dumb question
fireontheway
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: May 17, 2006
KitMaker: 370 posts
Armorama: 368 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 - 12:03 PM UTC
I am sure this has been answered over and over again, but what are the holes for on both hatches and above above the drivers vision port and the bow MG? This is a HobbyBoss Flak bergepanther kit.

18Bravo
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 - 12:26 PM UTC
Recessed screw heads. Shep Paine's old book talks about how to make them.
fireontheway
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: May 17, 2006
KitMaker: 370 posts
Armorama: 368 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 - 12:33 PM UTC
I thought that to be an answer but every example that I could find of a panthers hatches or front slope did not show these. Thanks Bob.
Biggles2
Visit this Community
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 - 02:20 AM UTC
If those are recessed screws, why aren't they slotted? Oh no!! A major omission from HB!
fireontheway
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: May 17, 2006
KitMaker: 370 posts
Armorama: 368 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 - 12:11 PM UTC
Not that I dont go along with the recessed holes but thats alot of bolts in a hatch and on a front slope
SdAufKla
Visit this Community
South Carolina, United States
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 24, 2014 - 12:55 AM UTC
The majority of those are not actually recessed screw heads but rather conical bolt heads set in conical holes. There are actually no "slots" in them and they fit tightly into their holes with a friction fit (like a Morse tapered tool post on a lath or milling machine).

On the prototype tanks, they're also usually not so visible being either almost perfectly flush with the surface or just slightly proud or recessed with the surface. They're hard to see in most photos because they're usually fitted so well at the factory that a coat of paint almost covers them.

However, there are a bunch of them on many German tanks and without checking against a set of plans, these look about right in number and placement. These do seem a little too "distinct" and might look a little better if they were given a coat of Mr. Surfacer to make them less prominent.

HTH,
fireontheway
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: May 17, 2006
KitMaker: 370 posts
Armorama: 368 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 24, 2014 - 03:27 AM UTC
Thanks Mike, so it's safe to assume if I fill them in with putty and sand smooth that should be ok?
tankmodeler
#417
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 01, 2004
KitMaker: 3,123 posts
Armorama: 2,539 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 24, 2014 - 04:13 AM UTC
I imagine what is OK is up to you. The counterbores look too deep. If you fill and sand them smooth, there will be no indication they are there at all. If that's OK to you, then it's OK. If you want to indicate that there is something there you can consider punching out some discs of thin sheet that fills or nearly fills the holes and then leave the resulting slight counterbore or over flush or simple circular edge to indicate where these nearly flush fastener heads are.

Lots of ways to do it.

If _you_ like it, whatever you do, then it's OK.

Paul
SdAufKla
Visit this Community
South Carolina, United States
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 24, 2014 - 04:24 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Thanks Mike, so it's safe to assume if I fill them in with putty and sand smooth that should be ok?



Personally, I wouldn't completely obliterate them. In the past on many of my own builds, I've gone to considerable trouble and effort to replicate these. I might do something to make these less distinct, but I'd still want them to show some. IMO, they add a bit of interest and detail to otherwise monotonous flat surfaces. But that's just my opinion.

However, as Paul says, the choice is up to you as to what (if anything) to do with them.
fireontheway
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: May 17, 2006
KitMaker: 370 posts
Armorama: 368 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 24, 2014 - 09:58 AM UTC
Mike, Paul thank you both. You have given me food for thought. I kind of felt that filling them with putty and sanding in the past has kind of left slight dimples. So I thought that might not make them disappear altogether, so I will work on it, thx again
tankmodeler
#417
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 01, 2004
KitMaker: 3,123 posts
Armorama: 2,539 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 24, 2014 - 10:18 AM UTC
You could also fill them completely fluch and to get the edge effect, get a brass tube with the interior diameter the same as the diameter of the counterbores. Sharpen the _outside_ of the tube and then press the sharpened tube into the kit right over where you filled the counterbores. Do it gently and it should leave a thin outline of a circle in or near the filler you applied. Even if it's not perfect, you can't always see the whole outline of the fastener anyway so it looks even more realistic!

And, of course, you can use all three methods to get a varied look.

Just some random thoughts,,,

Paul
fireontheway
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: May 17, 2006
KitMaker: 370 posts
Armorama: 368 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 24, 2014 - 10:23 AM UTC
Thanks Paul another idea I hadnt thought of and 1 to now think about.
 _GOTOTOP